1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451
//! This pretty-printer is a direct reimplementation of Philip Karlton's
//! Mesa pretty-printer, as described in the appendix to
//! Derek C. Oppen, "Pretty Printing" (1979),
//! Stanford Computer Science Department STAN-CS-79-770,
//! <http://i.stanford.edu/pub/cstr/reports/cs/tr/79/770/CS-TR-79-770.pdf>.
//!
//! The algorithm's aim is to break a stream into as few lines as possible
//! while respecting the indentation-consistency requirements of the enclosing
//! block, and avoiding breaking at silly places on block boundaries, for
//! example, between "x" and ")" in "x)".
//!
//! I am implementing this algorithm because it comes with 20 pages of
//! documentation explaining its theory, and because it addresses the set of
//! concerns I've seen other pretty-printers fall down on. Weirdly. Even though
//! it's 32 years old. What can I say?
//!
//! Despite some redundancies and quirks in the way it's implemented in that
//! paper, I've opted to keep the implementation here as similar as I can,
//! changing only what was blatantly wrong, a typo, or sufficiently
//! non-idiomatic rust that it really stuck out.
//!
//! In particular you'll see a certain amount of churn related to INTEGER vs.
//! CARDINAL in the Mesa implementation. Mesa apparently interconverts the two
//! somewhat readily? In any case, I've used usize for indices-in-buffers and
//! ints for character-sizes-and-indentation-offsets. This respects the need
//! for ints to "go negative" while carrying a pending-calculation balance, and
//! helps differentiate all the numbers flying around internally (slightly).
//!
//! I also inverted the indentation arithmetic used in the print stack, since
//! the Mesa implementation (somewhat randomly) stores the offset on the print
//! stack in terms of margin-col rather than col itself. I store col.
//!
//! I also implemented a small change in the String token, in that I store an
//! explicit length for the string. For most tokens this is just the length of
//! the accompanying string. But it's necessary to permit it to differ, for
//! encoding things that are supposed to "go on their own line" -- certain
//! classes of comment and blank-line -- where relying on adjacent
//! hardbreak-like Break tokens with long blankness indication doesn't actually
//! work. To see why, consider when there is a "thing that should be on its own
//! line" between two long blocks, say functions. If you put a hardbreak after
//! each function (or before each) and the breaking algorithm decides to break
//! there anyways (because the functions themselves are long) you wind up with
//! extra blank lines. If you don't put hardbreaks you can wind up with the
//! "thing which should be on its own line" not getting its own line in the
//! rare case of "really small functions" or such. This re-occurs with comments
//! and explicit blank lines. So in those cases we use a string with a payload
//! we want isolated to a line and an explicit length that's huge, surrounded
//! by two zero-length breaks. The algorithm will try its best to fit it on a
//! line (which it can't) and so naturally place the content on its own line to
//! avoid combining it with other lines and making matters even worse.
//!
//! # Explanation
//!
//! In case you do not have the paper, here is an explanation of what's going
//! on.
//!
//! There is a stream of input tokens flowing through this printer.
//!
//! The printer buffers up to 3N tokens inside itself, where N is linewidth.
//! Yes, linewidth is chars and tokens are multi-char, but in the worst
//! case every token worth buffering is 1 char long, so it's ok.
//!
//! Tokens are String, Break, and Begin/End to delimit blocks.
//!
//! Begin tokens can carry an offset, saying "how far to indent when you break
//! inside here", as well as a flag indicating "consistent" or "inconsistent"
//! breaking. Consistent breaking means that after the first break, no attempt
//! will be made to flow subsequent breaks together onto lines. Inconsistent
//! is the opposite. Inconsistent breaking example would be, say:
//!
//! ```ignore (illustrative)
//! foo(hello, there, good, friends)
//! ```
//!
//! breaking inconsistently to become
//!
//! ```ignore (illustrative)
//! foo(hello, there,
//! good, friends);
//! ```
//!
//! whereas a consistent breaking would yield:
//!
//! ```ignore (illustrative)
//! foo(hello,
//! there,
//! good,
//! friends);
//! ```
//!
//! That is, in the consistent-break blocks we value vertical alignment
//! more than the ability to cram stuff onto a line. But in all cases if it
//! can make a block a one-liner, it'll do so.
//!
//! Carrying on with high-level logic:
//!
//! The buffered tokens go through a ring-buffer, 'tokens'. The 'left' and
//! 'right' indices denote the active portion of the ring buffer as well as
//! describing hypothetical points-in-the-infinite-stream at most 3N tokens
//! apart (i.e., "not wrapped to ring-buffer boundaries"). The paper will switch
//! between using 'left' and 'right' terms to denote the wrapped-to-ring-buffer
//! and point-in-infinite-stream senses freely.
//!
//! There is a parallel ring buffer, `size`, that holds the calculated size of
//! each token. Why calculated? Because for Begin/End pairs, the "size"
//! includes everything between the pair. That is, the "size" of Begin is
//! actually the sum of the sizes of everything between Begin and the paired
//! End that follows. Since that is arbitrarily far in the future, `size` is
//! being rewritten regularly while the printer runs; in fact most of the
//! machinery is here to work out `size` entries on the fly (and give up when
//! they're so obviously over-long that "infinity" is a good enough
//! approximation for purposes of line breaking).
//!
//! The "input side" of the printer is managed as an abstract process called
//! SCAN, which uses `scan_stack`, to manage calculating `size`. SCAN is, in
//! other words, the process of calculating 'size' entries.
//!
//! The "output side" of the printer is managed by an abstract process called
//! PRINT, which uses `print_stack`, `margin` and `space` to figure out what to
//! do with each token/size pair it consumes as it goes. It's trying to consume
//! the entire buffered window, but can't output anything until the size is >=
//! 0 (sizes are set to negative while they're pending calculation).
//!
//! So SCAN takes input and buffers tokens and pending calculations, while
//! PRINT gobbles up completed calculations and tokens from the buffer. The
//! theory is that the two can never get more than 3N tokens apart, because
//! once there's "obviously" too much data to fit on a line, in a size
//! calculation, SCAN will write "infinity" to the size and let PRINT consume
//! it.
//!
//! In this implementation (following the paper, again) the SCAN process is the
//! methods called `Printer::scan_*`, and the 'PRINT' process is the
//! method called `Printer::print`.
mod convenience;
mod ring;
use ring::RingBuffer;
use std::borrow::Cow;
use std::cmp;
use std::collections::VecDeque;
use std::iter;
/// How to break. Described in more detail in the module docs.
#[derive(Clone, Copy, PartialEq)]
pub enum Breaks {
Consistent,
Inconsistent,
}
#[derive(Clone, Copy, PartialEq)]
enum IndentStyle {
/// Vertically aligned under whatever column this block begins at.
///
/// fn demo(arg1: usize,
/// arg2: usize) {}
Visual,
/// Indented relative to the indentation level of the previous line.
///
/// fn demo(
/// arg1: usize,
/// arg2: usize,
/// ) {}
Block { offset: isize },
}
#[derive(Clone, Copy, Default, PartialEq)]
pub struct BreakToken {
offset: isize,
blank_space: isize,
pre_break: Option<char>,
}
#[derive(Clone, Copy, PartialEq)]
pub struct BeginToken {
indent: IndentStyle,
breaks: Breaks,
}
#[derive(Clone, PartialEq)]
pub enum Token {
// In practice a string token contains either a `&'static str` or a
// `String`. `Cow` is overkill for this because we never modify the data,
// but it's more convenient than rolling our own more specialized type.
String(Cow<'static, str>),
Break(BreakToken),
Begin(BeginToken),
End,
}
#[derive(Copy, Clone)]
enum PrintFrame {
Fits,
Broken { indent: usize, breaks: Breaks },
}
const SIZE_INFINITY: isize = 0xffff;
/// Target line width.
const MARGIN: isize = 78;
/// Every line is allowed at least this much space, even if highly indented.
const MIN_SPACE: isize = 60;
pub struct Printer {
out: String,
/// Number of spaces left on line
space: isize,
/// Ring-buffer of tokens and calculated sizes
buf: RingBuffer<BufEntry>,
/// Running size of stream "...left"
left_total: isize,
/// Running size of stream "...right"
right_total: isize,
/// Pseudo-stack, really a ring too. Holds the
/// primary-ring-buffers index of the Begin that started the
/// current block, possibly with the most recent Break after that
/// Begin (if there is any) on top of it. Stuff is flushed off the
/// bottom as it becomes irrelevant due to the primary ring-buffer
/// advancing.
scan_stack: VecDeque<usize>,
/// Stack of blocks-in-progress being flushed by print
print_stack: Vec<PrintFrame>,
/// Level of indentation of current line
indent: usize,
/// Buffered indentation to avoid writing trailing whitespace
pending_indentation: isize,
/// The token most recently popped from the left boundary of the
/// ring-buffer for printing
last_printed: Option<Token>,
}
#[derive(Clone)]
struct BufEntry {
token: Token,
size: isize,
}
impl Printer {
pub fn new() -> Self {
Printer {
out: String::new(),
space: MARGIN,
buf: RingBuffer::new(),
left_total: 0,
right_total: 0,
scan_stack: VecDeque::new(),
print_stack: Vec::new(),
indent: 0,
pending_indentation: 0,
last_printed: None,
}
}
pub fn last_token(&self) -> Option<&Token> {
self.last_token_still_buffered().or_else(|| self.last_printed.as_ref())
}
pub fn last_token_still_buffered(&self) -> Option<&Token> {
self.buf.last().map(|last| &last.token)
}
/// Be very careful with this!
pub fn replace_last_token_still_buffered(&mut self, token: Token) {
self.buf.last_mut().unwrap().token = token;
}
fn scan_eof(&mut self) {
if !self.scan_stack.is_empty() {
self.check_stack(0);
self.advance_left();
}
}
fn scan_begin(&mut self, token: BeginToken) {
if self.scan_stack.is_empty() {
self.left_total = 1;
self.right_total = 1;
self.buf.clear();
}
let right = self.buf.push(BufEntry { token: Token::Begin(token), size: -self.right_total });
self.scan_stack.push_back(right);
}
fn scan_end(&mut self) {
if self.scan_stack.is_empty() {
self.print_end();
} else {
let right = self.buf.push(BufEntry { token: Token::End, size: -1 });
self.scan_stack.push_back(right);
}
}
fn scan_break(&mut self, token: BreakToken) {
if self.scan_stack.is_empty() {
self.left_total = 1;
self.right_total = 1;
self.buf.clear();
} else {
self.check_stack(0);
}
let right = self.buf.push(BufEntry { token: Token::Break(token), size: -self.right_total });
self.scan_stack.push_back(right);
self.right_total += token.blank_space;
}
fn scan_string(&mut self, string: Cow<'static, str>) {
if self.scan_stack.is_empty() {
self.print_string(&string);
} else {
let len = string.len() as isize;
self.buf.push(BufEntry { token: Token::String(string), size: len });
self.right_total += len;
self.check_stream();
}
}
pub fn offset(&mut self, offset: isize) {
if let Some(BufEntry { token: Token::Break(token), .. }) = &mut self.buf.last_mut() {
token.offset += offset;
}
}
fn check_stream(&mut self) {
while self.right_total - self.left_total > self.space {
if *self.scan_stack.front().unwrap() == self.buf.index_of_first() {
self.scan_stack.pop_front().unwrap();
self.buf.first_mut().unwrap().size = SIZE_INFINITY;
}
self.advance_left();
if self.buf.is_empty() {
break;
}
}
}
fn advance_left(&mut self) {
while self.buf.first().unwrap().size >= 0 {
let left = self.buf.pop_first().unwrap();
match &left.token {
Token::String(string) => {
self.left_total += string.len() as isize;
self.print_string(string);
}
Token::Break(token) => {
self.left_total += token.blank_space;
self.print_break(*token, left.size);
}
Token::Begin(token) => self.print_begin(*token, left.size),
Token::End => self.print_end(),
}
self.last_printed = Some(left.token);
if self.buf.is_empty() {
break;
}
}
}
fn check_stack(&mut self, mut depth: usize) {
while let Some(&index) = self.scan_stack.back() {
let mut entry = &mut self.buf[index];
match entry.token {
Token::Begin(_) => {
if depth == 0 {
break;
}
self.scan_stack.pop_back().unwrap();
entry.size += self.right_total;
depth -= 1;
}
Token::End => {
// paper says + not =, but that makes no sense.
self.scan_stack.pop_back().unwrap();
entry.size = 1;
depth += 1;
}
_ => {
self.scan_stack.pop_back().unwrap();
entry.size += self.right_total;
if depth == 0 {
break;
}
}
}
}
}
fn get_top(&self) -> PrintFrame {
*self
.print_stack
.last()
.unwrap_or(&PrintFrame::Broken { indent: 0, breaks: Breaks::Inconsistent })
}
fn print_begin(&mut self, token: BeginToken, size: isize) {
if size > self.space {
self.print_stack.push(PrintFrame::Broken { indent: self.indent, breaks: token.breaks });
self.indent = match token.indent {
IndentStyle::Block { offset } => {
usize::try_from(self.indent as isize + offset).unwrap()
}
IndentStyle::Visual => (MARGIN - self.space) as usize,
};
} else {
self.print_stack.push(PrintFrame::Fits);
}
}
fn print_end(&mut self) {
if let PrintFrame::Broken { indent, .. } = self.print_stack.pop().unwrap() {
self.indent = indent;
}
}
fn print_break(&mut self, token: BreakToken, size: isize) {
let fits = match self.get_top() {
PrintFrame::Fits => true,
PrintFrame::Broken { breaks: Breaks::Consistent, .. } => false,
PrintFrame::Broken { breaks: Breaks::Inconsistent, .. } => size <= self.space,
};
if fits {
self.pending_indentation += token.blank_space;
self.space -= token.blank_space;
} else {
if let Some(pre_break) = token.pre_break {
self.out.push(pre_break);
}
self.out.push('\n');
let indent = self.indent as isize + token.offset;
self.pending_indentation = indent;
self.space = cmp::max(MARGIN - indent, MIN_SPACE);
}
}
fn print_string(&mut self, string: &str) {
// Write the pending indent. A more concise way of doing this would be:
//
// write!(self.out, "{: >n$}", "", n = self.pending_indentation as usize)?;
//
// But that is significantly slower. This code is sufficiently hot, and indents can get
// sufficiently large, that the difference is significant on some workloads.
self.out.reserve(self.pending_indentation as usize);
self.out.extend(iter::repeat(' ').take(self.pending_indentation as usize));
self.pending_indentation = 0;
self.out.push_str(string);
self.space -= string.len() as isize;
}
}