negative_impls
The tracking issue for this feature is #68318.
With the feature gate negative_impls
, you can write negative impls as well as positive ones:
#![allow(unused)] #![feature(negative_impls)] fn main() { trait DerefMut { } impl<T: ?Sized> !DerefMut for &T { } }
Negative impls indicate a semver guarantee that the given trait will not be implemented for the given types. Negative impls play an additional purpose for auto traits, described below.
Negative impls have the following characteristics:
- They do not have any items.
- They must obey the orphan rules as if they were a positive impl.
- They cannot "overlap" with any positive impls.
Semver interaction
It is a breaking change to remove a negative impl. Negative impls are a commitment not to implement the given trait for the named types.
Orphan and overlap rules
Negative impls must obey the same orphan rules as a positive impl. This implies you cannot add a negative impl for types defined in upstream crates and so forth.
Similarly, negative impls cannot overlap with positive impls, again using the same "overlap" check that we ordinarily use to determine if two impls overlap. (Note that positive impls typically cannot overlap with one another either, except as permitted by specialization.)
Interaction with auto traits
Declaring a negative impl impl !SomeAutoTrait for SomeType
for an
auto-trait serves two purposes:
- as with any trait, it declares that
SomeType
will never implementSomeAutoTrait
; - it disables the automatic
SomeType: SomeAutoTrait
impl that would otherwise have been generated.
Note that, at present, there is no way to indicate that a given type
does not implement an auto trait but that it may do so in the
future. For ordinary types, this is done by simply not declaring any
impl at all, but that is not an option for auto traits. A workaround
is that one could embed a marker type as one of the fields, where the
marker type is !AutoTrait
.
Immediate uses
Negative impls are used to declare that &T: !DerefMut
and &mut T: !Clone
, as required to fix the soundness of Pin
described in #66544.
This serves two purposes:
- For proving the correctness of unsafe code, we can use that impl as evidence that no
DerefMut
orClone
impl exists. - It prevents downstream crates from creating such impls.