1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849
//! Propagates assignment destinations backwards in the CFG to eliminate redundant assignments.
//!
//! # Motivation
//!
//! MIR building can insert a lot of redundant copies, and Rust code in general often tends to move
//! values around a lot. The result is a lot of assignments of the form `dest = {move} src;` in MIR.
//! MIR building for constants in particular tends to create additional locals that are only used
//! inside a single block to shuffle a value around unnecessarily.
//!
//! LLVM by itself is not good enough at eliminating these redundant copies (eg. see
//! <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/32966>), so this leaves some performance on the table
//! that we can regain by implementing an optimization for removing these assign statements in rustc
//! itself. When this optimization runs fast enough, it can also speed up the constant evaluation
//! and code generation phases of rustc due to the reduced number of statements and locals.
//!
//! # The Optimization
//!
//! Conceptually, this optimization is "destination propagation". It is similar to the Named Return
//! Value Optimization, or NRVO, known from the C++ world, except that it isn't limited to return
//! values or the return place `_0`. On a very high level, independent of the actual implementation
//! details, it does the following:
//!
//! 1) Identify `dest = src;` statements with values for `dest` and `src` whose storage can soundly
//! be merged.
//! 2) Replace all mentions of `src` with `dest` ("unifying" them and propagating the destination
//! backwards).
//! 3) Delete the `dest = src;` statement (by making it a `nop`).
//!
//! Step 1) is by far the hardest, so it is explained in more detail below.
//!
//! ## Soundness
//!
//! We have a pair of places `p` and `q`, whose memory we would like to merge. In order for this to
//! be sound, we need to check a number of conditions:
//!
//! * `p` and `q` must both be *constant* - it does not make much sense to talk about merging them
//! if they do not consistently refer to the same place in memory. This is satisfied if they do
//! not contain any indirection through a pointer or any indexing projections.
//!
//! * `p` and `q` must have the **same type**. If we replace a local with a subtype or supertype,
//! we may end up with a differnet vtable for that local. See the `subtyping-impacts-selection`
//! tests for an example where that causes issues.
//!
//! * We need to make sure that the goal of "merging the memory" is actually structurally possible
//! in MIR. For example, even if all the other conditions are satisfied, there is no way to
//! "merge" `_5.foo` and `_6.bar`. For now, we ensure this by requiring that both `p` and `q` are
//! locals with no further projections. Future iterations of this pass should improve on this.
//!
//! * Finally, we want `p` and `q` to use the same memory - however, we still need to make sure that
//! each of them has enough "ownership" of that memory to continue "doing its job." More
//! precisely, what we will check is that whenever the program performs a write to `p`, then it
//! does not currently care about what the value in `q` is (and vice versa). We formalize the
//! notion of "does not care what the value in `q` is" by checking the *liveness* of `q`.
//!
//! Because of the difficulty of computing liveness of places that have their address taken, we do
//! not even attempt to do it. Any places that are in a local that has its address taken is
//! excluded from the optimization.
//!
//! The first two conditions are simple structural requirements on the `Assign` statements that can
//! be trivially checked. The third requirement however is more difficult and costly to check.
//!
//! ## Future Improvements
//!
//! There are a number of ways in which this pass could be improved in the future:
//!
//! * Merging storage liveness ranges instead of removing storage statements completely. This may
//! improve stack usage.
//!
//! * Allow merging locals into places with projections, eg `_5` into `_6.foo`.
//!
//! * Liveness analysis with more precision than whole locals at a time. The smaller benefit of this
//! is that it would allow us to dest prop at "sub-local" levels in some cases. The bigger benefit
//! of this is that such liveness analysis can report more accurate results about whole locals at
//! a time. For example, consider:
//!
//! ```ignore (syntax-highlighting-only)
//! _1 = u;
//! // unrelated code
//! _1.f1 = v;
//! _2 = _1.f1;
//! ```
//!
//! Because the current analysis only thinks in terms of locals, it does not have enough
//! information to report that `_1` is dead in the "unrelated code" section.
//!
//! * Liveness analysis enabled by alias analysis. This would allow us to not just bail on locals
//! that ever have their address taken. Of course that requires actually having alias analysis
//! (and a model to build it on), so this might be a bit of a ways off.
//!
//! * Various perf improvements. There are a bunch of comments in here marked `PERF` with ideas for
//! how to do things more efficiently. However, the complexity of the pass as a whole should be
//! kept in mind.
//!
//! ## Previous Work
//!
//! A [previous attempt][attempt 1] at implementing an optimization like this turned out to be a
//! significant regression in compiler performance. Fixing the regressions introduced a lot of
//! undesirable complexity to the implementation.
//!
//! A [subsequent approach][attempt 2] tried to avoid the costly computation by limiting itself to
//! acyclic CFGs, but still turned out to be far too costly to run due to suboptimal performance
//! within individual basic blocks, requiring a walk across the entire block for every assignment
//! found within the block. For the `tuple-stress` benchmark, which has 458745 statements in a
//! single block, this proved to be far too costly.
//!
//! [Another approach after that][attempt 3] was much closer to correct, but had some soundness
//! issues - it was failing to consider stores outside live ranges, and failed to uphold some of the
//! requirements that MIR has for non-overlapping places within statements. However, it also had
//! performance issues caused by `O(l² * s)` runtime, where `l` is the number of locals and `s` is
//! the number of statements and terminators.
//!
//! Since the first attempt at this, the compiler has improved dramatically, and new analysis
//! frameworks have been added that should make this approach viable without requiring a limited
//! approach that only works for some classes of CFGs:
//! - rustc now has a powerful dataflow analysis framework that can handle forwards and backwards
//! analyses efficiently.
//! - Layout optimizations for generators have been added to improve code generation for
//! async/await, which are very similar in spirit to what this optimization does.
//!
//! Also, rustc now has a simple NRVO pass (see `nrvo.rs`), which handles a subset of the cases that
//! this destination propagation pass handles, proving that similar optimizations can be performed
//! on MIR.
//!
//! ## Pre/Post Optimization
//!
//! It is recommended to run `SimplifyCfg` and then `SimplifyLocals` some time after this pass, as
//! it replaces the eliminated assign statements with `nop`s and leaves unused locals behind.
//!
//! [liveness]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Live_variable_analysis
//! [attempt 1]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/47954
//! [attempt 2]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/71003
//! [attempt 3]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/72632
use std::collections::hash_map::{Entry, OccupiedEntry};
use crate::simplify::remove_dead_blocks;
use crate::MirPass;
use rustc_data_structures::fx::FxHashMap;
use rustc_index::bit_set::BitSet;
use rustc_middle::mir::visit::{MutVisitor, PlaceContext, Visitor};
use rustc_middle::mir::HasLocalDecls;
use rustc_middle::mir::{dump_mir, PassWhere};
use rustc_middle::mir::{
traversal, Body, InlineAsmOperand, Local, LocalKind, Location, Operand, Place, Rvalue,
Statement, StatementKind, TerminatorKind,
};
use rustc_middle::ty::TyCtxt;
use rustc_mir_dataflow::impls::MaybeLiveLocals;
use rustc_mir_dataflow::{Analysis, ResultsCursor};
pub struct DestinationPropagation;
impl<'tcx> MirPass<'tcx> for DestinationPropagation {
fn is_enabled(&self, sess: &rustc_session::Session) -> bool {
// For now, only run at MIR opt level 3. Two things need to be changed before this can be
// turned on by default:
// 1. Because of the overeager removal of storage statements, this can cause stack space
// regressions. This opt is not the place to fix this though, it's a more general
// problem in MIR.
// 2. Despite being an overall perf improvement, this still causes a 30% regression in
// keccak. We can temporarily fix this by bounding function size, but in the long term
// we should fix this by being smarter about invalidating analysis results.
sess.mir_opt_level() >= 3
}
fn run_pass(&self, tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>, body: &mut Body<'tcx>) {
let def_id = body.source.def_id();
let mut allocations = Allocations::default();
trace!(func = ?tcx.def_path_str(def_id));
let borrowed = rustc_mir_dataflow::impls::borrowed_locals(body);
// In order to avoid having to collect data for every single pair of locals in the body, we
// do not allow doing more than one merge for places that are derived from the same local at
// once. To avoid missed opportunities, we instead iterate to a fixed point - we'll refer to
// each of these iterations as a "round."
//
// Reaching a fixed point could in theory take up to `min(l, s)` rounds - however, we do not
// expect to see MIR like that. To verify this, a test was run against `[rust-lang/regex]` -
// the average MIR body saw 1.32 full iterations of this loop. The most that was hit were 30
// for a single function. Only 80/2801 (2.9%) of functions saw at least 5.
//
// [rust-lang/regex]:
// https://github.com/rust-lang/regex/tree/b5372864e2df6a2f5e543a556a62197f50ca3650
let mut round_count = 0;
loop {
// PERF: Can we do something smarter than recalculating the candidates and liveness
// results?
let mut candidates = find_candidates(
body,
&borrowed,
&mut allocations.candidates,
&mut allocations.candidates_reverse,
);
trace!(?candidates);
let mut live = MaybeLiveLocals
.into_engine(tcx, body)
.iterate_to_fixpoint()
.into_results_cursor(body);
dest_prop_mir_dump(tcx, body, &mut live, round_count);
FilterInformation::filter_liveness(
&mut candidates,
&mut live,
&mut allocations.write_info,
body,
);
// Because we do not update liveness information, it is unsound to use a local for more
// than one merge operation within a single round of optimizations. We store here which
// ones we have already used.
let mut merged_locals: BitSet<Local> = BitSet::new_empty(body.local_decls.len());
// This is the set of merges we will apply this round. It is a subset of the candidates.
let mut merges = FxHashMap::default();
for (src, candidates) in candidates.c.iter() {
if merged_locals.contains(*src) {
continue;
}
let Some(dest) = candidates.iter().find(|dest| !merged_locals.contains(**dest))
else {
continue;
};
if !tcx.consider_optimizing(|| {
format!("{} round {}", tcx.def_path_str(def_id), round_count)
}) {
break;
}
merges.insert(*src, *dest);
merged_locals.insert(*src);
merged_locals.insert(*dest);
}
trace!(merging = ?merges);
if merges.is_empty() {
break;
}
round_count += 1;
apply_merges(body, tcx, &merges, &merged_locals);
}
if round_count != 0 {
// Merging can introduce overlap between moved arguments and/or call destination in an
// unreachable code, which validator considers to be ill-formed.
remove_dead_blocks(tcx, body);
}
trace!(round_count);
}
}
/// Container for the various allocations that we need.
///
/// We store these here and hand out `&mut` access to them, instead of dropping and recreating them
/// frequently. Everything with a `&'alloc` lifetime points into here.
#[derive(Default)]
struct Allocations {
candidates: FxHashMap<Local, Vec<Local>>,
candidates_reverse: FxHashMap<Local, Vec<Local>>,
write_info: WriteInfo,
// PERF: Do this for `MaybeLiveLocals` allocations too.
}
#[derive(Debug)]
struct Candidates<'alloc> {
/// The set of candidates we are considering in this optimization.
///
/// We will always merge the key into at most one of its values.
///
/// Whether a place ends up in the key or the value does not correspond to whether it appears as
/// the lhs or rhs of any assignment. As a matter of fact, the places in here might never appear
/// in an assignment at all. This happens because if we see an assignment like this:
///
/// ```ignore (syntax-highlighting-only)
/// _1.0 = _2.0
/// ```
///
/// We will still report that we would like to merge `_1` and `_2` in an attempt to allow us to
/// remove that assignment.
c: &'alloc mut FxHashMap<Local, Vec<Local>>,
/// A reverse index of the `c` set; if the `c` set contains `a => Place { local: b, proj }`,
/// then this contains `b => a`.
// PERF: Possibly these should be `SmallVec`s?
reverse: &'alloc mut FxHashMap<Local, Vec<Local>>,
}
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
// Merging
//
// Applies the actual optimization
fn apply_merges<'tcx>(
body: &mut Body<'tcx>,
tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>,
merges: &FxHashMap<Local, Local>,
merged_locals: &BitSet<Local>,
) {
let mut merger = Merger { tcx, merges, merged_locals };
merger.visit_body_preserves_cfg(body);
}
struct Merger<'a, 'tcx> {
tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>,
merges: &'a FxHashMap<Local, Local>,
merged_locals: &'a BitSet<Local>,
}
impl<'a, 'tcx> MutVisitor<'tcx> for Merger<'a, 'tcx> {
fn tcx(&self) -> TyCtxt<'tcx> {
self.tcx
}
fn visit_local(&mut self, local: &mut Local, _: PlaceContext, _location: Location) {
if let Some(dest) = self.merges.get(local) {
*local = *dest;
}
}
fn visit_statement(&mut self, statement: &mut Statement<'tcx>, location: Location) {
match &statement.kind {
// FIXME: Don't delete storage statements, but "merge" the storage ranges instead.
StatementKind::StorageDead(local) | StatementKind::StorageLive(local)
if self.merged_locals.contains(*local) =>
{
statement.make_nop();
return;
}
_ => (),
};
self.super_statement(statement, location);
match &statement.kind {
StatementKind::Assign(box (dest, rvalue)) => {
match rvalue {
Rvalue::CopyForDeref(place)
| Rvalue::Use(Operand::Copy(place) | Operand::Move(place)) => {
// These might've been turned into self-assignments by the replacement
// (this includes the original statement we wanted to eliminate).
if dest == place {
debug!("{:?} turned into self-assignment, deleting", location);
statement.make_nop();
}
}
_ => {}
}
}
_ => {}
}
}
}
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
// Liveness filtering
//
// This section enforces bullet point 2
struct FilterInformation<'a, 'body, 'alloc, 'tcx> {
body: &'body Body<'tcx>,
live: &'a mut ResultsCursor<'body, 'tcx, MaybeLiveLocals>,
candidates: &'a mut Candidates<'alloc>,
write_info: &'alloc mut WriteInfo,
at: Location,
}
// We first implement some utility functions which we will expose removing candidates according to
// different needs. Throughout the liveness filtering, the `candidates` are only ever accessed
// through these methods, and not directly.
impl<'alloc> Candidates<'alloc> {
/// Just `Vec::retain`, but the condition is inverted and we add debugging output
fn vec_filter_candidates(
src: Local,
v: &mut Vec<Local>,
mut f: impl FnMut(Local) -> CandidateFilter,
at: Location,
) {
v.retain(|dest| {
let remove = f(*dest);
if remove == CandidateFilter::Remove {
trace!("eliminating {:?} => {:?} due to conflict at {:?}", src, dest, at);
}
remove == CandidateFilter::Keep
});
}
/// `vec_filter_candidates` but for an `Entry`
fn entry_filter_candidates(
mut entry: OccupiedEntry<'_, Local, Vec<Local>>,
p: Local,
f: impl FnMut(Local) -> CandidateFilter,
at: Location,
) {
let candidates = entry.get_mut();
Self::vec_filter_candidates(p, candidates, f, at);
if candidates.len() == 0 {
entry.remove();
}
}
/// For all candidates `(p, q)` or `(q, p)` removes the candidate if `f(q)` says to do so
fn filter_candidates_by(
&mut self,
p: Local,
mut f: impl FnMut(Local) -> CandidateFilter,
at: Location,
) {
// Cover the cases where `p` appears as a `src`
if let Entry::Occupied(entry) = self.c.entry(p) {
Self::entry_filter_candidates(entry, p, &mut f, at);
}
// And the cases where `p` appears as a `dest`
let Some(srcs) = self.reverse.get_mut(&p) else {
return;
};
// We use `retain` here to remove the elements from the reverse set if we've removed the
// matching candidate in the forward set.
srcs.retain(|src| {
if f(*src) == CandidateFilter::Keep {
return true;
}
let Entry::Occupied(entry) = self.c.entry(*src) else {
return false;
};
Self::entry_filter_candidates(
entry,
*src,
|dest| {
if dest == p { CandidateFilter::Remove } else { CandidateFilter::Keep }
},
at,
);
false
});
}
}
#[derive(Copy, Clone, PartialEq, Eq)]
enum CandidateFilter {
Keep,
Remove,
}
impl<'a, 'body, 'alloc, 'tcx> FilterInformation<'a, 'body, 'alloc, 'tcx> {
/// Filters the set of candidates to remove those that conflict.
///
/// The steps we take are exactly those that are outlined at the top of the file. For each
/// statement/terminator, we collect the set of locals that are written to in that
/// statement/terminator, and then we remove all pairs of candidates that contain one such local
/// and another one that is live.
///
/// We need to be careful about the ordering of operations within each statement/terminator
/// here. Many statements might write and read from more than one place, and we need to consider
/// them all. The strategy for doing this is as follows: We first gather all the places that are
/// written to within the statement/terminator via `WriteInfo`. Then, we use the liveness
/// analysis from *before* the statement/terminator (in the control flow sense) to eliminate
/// candidates - this is because we want to conservatively treat a pair of locals that is both
/// read and written in the statement/terminator to be conflicting, and the liveness analysis
/// before the statement/terminator will correctly report locals that are read in the
/// statement/terminator to be live. We are additionally conservative by treating all written to
/// locals as also being read from.
fn filter_liveness<'b>(
candidates: &mut Candidates<'alloc>,
live: &mut ResultsCursor<'b, 'tcx, MaybeLiveLocals>,
write_info_alloc: &'alloc mut WriteInfo,
body: &'b Body<'tcx>,
) {
let mut this = FilterInformation {
body,
live,
candidates,
// We don't actually store anything at this scope, we just keep things here to be able
// to reuse the allocation.
write_info: write_info_alloc,
// Doesn't matter what we put here, will be overwritten before being used
at: Location::START,
};
this.internal_filter_liveness();
}
fn internal_filter_liveness(&mut self) {
for (block, data) in traversal::preorder(self.body) {
self.at = Location { block, statement_index: data.statements.len() };
self.live.seek_after_primary_effect(self.at);
self.write_info.for_terminator(&data.terminator().kind);
self.apply_conflicts();
for (i, statement) in data.statements.iter().enumerate().rev() {
self.at = Location { block, statement_index: i };
self.live.seek_after_primary_effect(self.at);
self.write_info.for_statement(&statement.kind, self.body);
self.apply_conflicts();
}
}
}
fn apply_conflicts(&mut self) {
let writes = &self.write_info.writes;
for p in writes {
let other_skip = self.write_info.skip_pair.and_then(|(a, b)| {
if a == *p {
Some(b)
} else if b == *p {
Some(a)
} else {
None
}
});
self.candidates.filter_candidates_by(
*p,
|q| {
if Some(q) == other_skip {
return CandidateFilter::Keep;
}
// It is possible that a local may be live for less than the
// duration of a statement This happens in the case of function
// calls or inline asm. Because of this, we also mark locals as
// conflicting when both of them are written to in the same
// statement.
if self.live.contains(q) || writes.contains(&q) {
CandidateFilter::Remove
} else {
CandidateFilter::Keep
}
},
self.at,
);
}
}
}
/// Describes where a statement/terminator writes to
#[derive(Default, Debug)]
struct WriteInfo {
writes: Vec<Local>,
/// If this pair of locals is a candidate pair, completely skip processing it during this
/// statement. All other candidates are unaffected.
skip_pair: Option<(Local, Local)>,
}
impl WriteInfo {
fn for_statement<'tcx>(&mut self, statement: &StatementKind<'tcx>, body: &Body<'tcx>) {
self.reset();
match statement {
StatementKind::Assign(box (lhs, rhs)) => {
self.add_place(*lhs);
match rhs {
Rvalue::Use(op) => {
self.add_operand(op);
self.consider_skipping_for_assign_use(*lhs, op, body);
}
Rvalue::Repeat(op, _) => {
self.add_operand(op);
}
Rvalue::Cast(_, op, _)
| Rvalue::UnaryOp(_, op)
| Rvalue::ShallowInitBox(op, _) => {
self.add_operand(op);
}
Rvalue::BinaryOp(_, ops) | Rvalue::CheckedBinaryOp(_, ops) => {
for op in [&ops.0, &ops.1] {
self.add_operand(op);
}
}
Rvalue::Aggregate(_, ops) => {
for op in ops {
self.add_operand(op);
}
}
Rvalue::ThreadLocalRef(_)
| Rvalue::NullaryOp(_, _)
| Rvalue::Ref(_, _, _)
| Rvalue::AddressOf(_, _)
| Rvalue::Len(_)
| Rvalue::Discriminant(_)
| Rvalue::CopyForDeref(_) => (),
}
}
// Retags are technically also reads, but reporting them as a write suffices
StatementKind::SetDiscriminant { place, .. }
| StatementKind::Deinit(place)
| StatementKind::Retag(_, place) => {
self.add_place(**place);
}
StatementKind::Intrinsic(_)
| StatementKind::ConstEvalCounter
| StatementKind::Nop
| StatementKind::Coverage(_)
| StatementKind::StorageLive(_)
| StatementKind::StorageDead(_)
| StatementKind::PlaceMention(_) => (),
StatementKind::FakeRead(_) | StatementKind::AscribeUserType(_, _) => {
bug!("{:?} not found in this MIR phase", statement)
}
}
}
fn consider_skipping_for_assign_use<'tcx>(
&mut self,
lhs: Place<'tcx>,
rhs: &Operand<'tcx>,
body: &Body<'tcx>,
) {
let Some(rhs) = rhs.place() else { return };
if let Some(pair) = places_to_candidate_pair(lhs, rhs, body) {
self.skip_pair = Some(pair);
}
}
fn for_terminator<'tcx>(&mut self, terminator: &TerminatorKind<'tcx>) {
self.reset();
match terminator {
TerminatorKind::SwitchInt { discr: op, .. }
| TerminatorKind::Assert { cond: op, .. } => {
self.add_operand(op);
}
TerminatorKind::Call { destination, func, args, .. } => {
self.add_place(*destination);
self.add_operand(func);
for arg in args {
self.add_operand(arg);
}
}
TerminatorKind::InlineAsm { operands, .. } => {
for asm_operand in operands {
match asm_operand {
InlineAsmOperand::In { value, .. } => {
self.add_operand(value);
}
InlineAsmOperand::Out { place, .. } => {
if let Some(place) = place {
self.add_place(*place);
}
}
// Note that the `late` field in `InOut` is about whether the registers used
// for these things overlap, and is of absolutely no interest to us.
InlineAsmOperand::InOut { in_value, out_place, .. } => {
if let Some(place) = out_place {
self.add_place(*place);
}
self.add_operand(in_value);
}
InlineAsmOperand::Const { .. }
| InlineAsmOperand::SymFn { .. }
| InlineAsmOperand::SymStatic { .. } => (),
}
}
}
TerminatorKind::Goto { .. }
| TerminatorKind::UnwindResume
| TerminatorKind::UnwindTerminate(_)
| TerminatorKind::Return
| TerminatorKind::Unreachable { .. } => (),
TerminatorKind::Drop { .. } => {
// `Drop`s create a `&mut` and so are not considered
}
TerminatorKind::Yield { .. }
| TerminatorKind::GeneratorDrop
| TerminatorKind::FalseEdge { .. }
| TerminatorKind::FalseUnwind { .. } => {
bug!("{:?} not found in this MIR phase", terminator)
}
}
}
fn add_place(&mut self, place: Place<'_>) {
self.writes.push(place.local);
}
fn add_operand<'tcx>(&mut self, op: &Operand<'tcx>) {
match op {
// FIXME(JakobDegen): In a previous version, the `Move` case was incorrectly treated as
// being a read only. This was unsound, however we cannot add a regression test because
// it is not possible to set this off with current MIR. Once we have that ability, a
// regression test should be added.
Operand::Move(p) => self.add_place(*p),
Operand::Copy(_) | Operand::Constant(_) => (),
}
}
fn reset(&mut self) {
self.writes.clear();
self.skip_pair = None;
}
}
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////
// Candidate accumulation
/// If the pair of places is being considered for merging, returns the candidate which would be
/// merged in order to accomplish this.
///
/// The contract here is in one direction - there is a guarantee that merging the locals that are
/// outputted by this function would result in an assignment between the inputs becoming a
/// self-assignment. However, there is no guarantee that the returned pair is actually suitable for
/// merging - candidate collection must still check this independently.
///
/// This output is unique for each unordered pair of input places.
fn places_to_candidate_pair<'tcx>(
a: Place<'tcx>,
b: Place<'tcx>,
body: &Body<'tcx>,
) -> Option<(Local, Local)> {
let (mut a, mut b) = if a.projection.len() == 0 && b.projection.len() == 0 {
(a.local, b.local)
} else {
return None;
};
// By sorting, we make sure we're input order independent
if a > b {
std::mem::swap(&mut a, &mut b);
}
// We could now return `(a, b)`, but then we miss some candidates in the case where `a` can't be
// used as a `src`.
if is_local_required(a, body) {
std::mem::swap(&mut a, &mut b);
}
// We could check `is_local_required` again here, but there's no need - after all, we make no
// promise that the candidate pair is actually valid
Some((a, b))
}
/// Collects the candidates for merging
///
/// This is responsible for enforcing the first and third bullet point.
fn find_candidates<'alloc, 'tcx>(
body: &Body<'tcx>,
borrowed: &BitSet<Local>,
candidates: &'alloc mut FxHashMap<Local, Vec<Local>>,
candidates_reverse: &'alloc mut FxHashMap<Local, Vec<Local>>,
) -> Candidates<'alloc> {
candidates.clear();
candidates_reverse.clear();
let mut visitor = FindAssignments { body, candidates, borrowed };
visitor.visit_body(body);
// Deduplicate candidates
for (_, cands) in candidates.iter_mut() {
cands.sort();
cands.dedup();
}
// Generate the reverse map
for (src, cands) in candidates.iter() {
for dest in cands.iter().copied() {
candidates_reverse.entry(dest).or_default().push(*src);
}
}
Candidates { c: candidates, reverse: candidates_reverse }
}
struct FindAssignments<'a, 'alloc, 'tcx> {
body: &'a Body<'tcx>,
candidates: &'alloc mut FxHashMap<Local, Vec<Local>>,
borrowed: &'a BitSet<Local>,
}
impl<'tcx> Visitor<'tcx> for FindAssignments<'_, '_, 'tcx> {
fn visit_statement(&mut self, statement: &Statement<'tcx>, _: Location) {
if let StatementKind::Assign(box (
lhs,
Rvalue::CopyForDeref(rhs) | Rvalue::Use(Operand::Copy(rhs) | Operand::Move(rhs)),
)) = &statement.kind
{
let Some((src, dest)) = places_to_candidate_pair(*lhs, *rhs, self.body) else {
return;
};
// As described at the top of the file, we do not go near things that have
// their address taken.
if self.borrowed.contains(src) || self.borrowed.contains(dest) {
return;
}
// As described at the top of this file, we do not touch locals which have
// different types.
let src_ty = self.body.local_decls()[src].ty;
let dest_ty = self.body.local_decls()[dest].ty;
if src_ty != dest_ty {
// FIXME(#112651): This can be removed afterwards. Also update the module description.
trace!("skipped `{src:?} = {dest:?}` due to subtyping: {src_ty} != {dest_ty}");
return;
}
// Also, we need to make sure that MIR actually allows the `src` to be removed
if is_local_required(src, self.body) {
return;
}
// We may insert duplicates here, but that's fine
self.candidates.entry(src).or_default().push(dest);
}
}
}
/// Some locals are part of the function's interface and can not be removed.
///
/// Note that these locals *can* still be merged with non-required locals by removing that other
/// local.
fn is_local_required(local: Local, body: &Body<'_>) -> bool {
match body.local_kind(local) {
LocalKind::Arg | LocalKind::ReturnPointer => true,
LocalKind::Temp => false,
}
}
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
// MIR Dump
fn dest_prop_mir_dump<'body, 'tcx>(
tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>,
body: &'body Body<'tcx>,
live: &mut ResultsCursor<'body, 'tcx, MaybeLiveLocals>,
round: usize,
) {
let mut reachable = None;
dump_mir(tcx, false, "DestinationPropagation-dataflow", &round, body, |pass_where, w| {
let reachable = reachable.get_or_insert_with(|| traversal::reachable_as_bitset(body));
match pass_where {
PassWhere::BeforeLocation(loc) if reachable.contains(loc.block) => {
live.seek_after_primary_effect(loc);
writeln!(w, " // live: {:?}", live.get())?;
}
PassWhere::AfterTerminator(bb) if reachable.contains(bb) => {
let loc = body.terminator_loc(bb);
live.seek_before_primary_effect(loc);
writeln!(w, " // live: {:?}", live.get())?;
}
PassWhere::BeforeBlock(bb) if reachable.contains(bb) => {
live.seek_to_block_start(bb);
writeln!(w, " // live: {:?}", live.get())?;
}
PassWhere::BeforeCFG | PassWhere::AfterCFG | PassWhere::AfterLocation(_) => {}
PassWhere::BeforeLocation(_) | PassWhere::AfterTerminator(_) => {
writeln!(w, " // live: <unreachable>")?;
}
PassWhere::BeforeBlock(_) => {
writeln!(w, " // live: <unreachable>")?;
}
}
Ok(())
});
}