1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257
//! Contains utilities for generating suggestions for borrowck errors related to unsatisfied
//! outlives constraints.
use rustc_data_structures::fx::FxIndexSet;
use rustc_errors::Diagnostic;
use rustc_middle::ty::RegionVid;
use smallvec::SmallVec;
use std::collections::BTreeMap;
use crate::MirBorrowckCtxt;
use super::{ErrorConstraintInfo, RegionName, RegionNameSource};
/// The different things we could suggest.
enum SuggestedConstraint {
/// Outlives(a, [b, c, d, ...]) => 'a: 'b + 'c + 'd + ...
Outlives(RegionName, SmallVec<[RegionName; 2]>),
/// 'a = 'b
Equal(RegionName, RegionName),
/// 'a: 'static i.e. 'a = 'static and the user should just use 'static
Static(RegionName),
}
/// Collects information about outlives constraints that needed to be added for a given MIR node
/// corresponding to a function definition.
///
/// Adds a help note suggesting adding a where clause with the needed constraints.
#[derive(Default)]
pub struct OutlivesSuggestionBuilder {
/// The list of outlives constraints that need to be added. Specifically, we map each free
/// region to all other regions that it must outlive. I will use the shorthand `fr:
/// outlived_frs`. Not all of these regions will already have names necessarily. Some could be
/// implicit free regions that we inferred. These will need to be given names in the final
/// suggestion message.
constraints_to_add: BTreeMap<RegionVid, Vec<RegionVid>>,
}
impl OutlivesSuggestionBuilder {
/// Returns `true` iff the `RegionNameSource` is a valid source for an outlives
/// suggestion.
//
// FIXME: Currently, we only report suggestions if the `RegionNameSource` is an early-bound
// region or a named region, avoiding using regions with synthetic names altogether. This
// allows us to avoid giving impossible suggestions (e.g. adding bounds to closure args).
// We can probably be less conservative, since some inferred free regions are namable (e.g.
// the user can explicitly name them. To do this, we would allow some regions whose names
// come from `MatchedAdtAndSegment`, being careful to filter out bad suggestions, such as
// naming the `'self` lifetime in methods, etc.
fn region_name_is_suggestable(name: &RegionName) -> bool {
match name.source {
RegionNameSource::NamedEarlyBoundRegion(..)
| RegionNameSource::NamedFreeRegion(..)
| RegionNameSource::Static => true,
// Don't give suggestions for upvars, closure return types, or other unnameable
// regions.
RegionNameSource::SynthesizedFreeEnvRegion(..)
| RegionNameSource::AnonRegionFromArgument(..)
| RegionNameSource::AnonRegionFromUpvar(..)
| RegionNameSource::AnonRegionFromOutput(..)
| RegionNameSource::AnonRegionFromYieldTy(..)
| RegionNameSource::AnonRegionFromAsyncFn(..)
| RegionNameSource::AnonRegionFromImplSignature(..) => {
debug!("Region {:?} is NOT suggestable", name);
false
}
}
}
/// Returns a name for the region if it is suggestable. See `region_name_is_suggestable`.
fn region_vid_to_name(
&self,
mbcx: &MirBorrowckCtxt<'_, '_>,
region: RegionVid,
) -> Option<RegionName> {
mbcx.give_region_a_name(region).filter(Self::region_name_is_suggestable)
}
/// Compiles a list of all suggestions to be printed in the final big suggestion.
fn compile_all_suggestions(
&self,
mbcx: &MirBorrowckCtxt<'_, '_>,
) -> SmallVec<[SuggestedConstraint; 2]> {
let mut suggested = SmallVec::new();
// Keep track of variables that we have already suggested unifying so that we don't print
// out silly duplicate messages.
let mut unified_already = FxIndexSet::default();
for (fr, outlived) in &self.constraints_to_add {
let Some(fr_name) = self.region_vid_to_name(mbcx, *fr) else {
continue;
};
let outlived = outlived
.iter()
// if there is a `None`, we will just omit that constraint
.filter_map(|fr| self.region_vid_to_name(mbcx, *fr).map(|rname| (fr, rname)))
.collect::<Vec<_>>();
// No suggestable outlived lifetimes.
if outlived.is_empty() {
continue;
}
// There are three types of suggestions we can make:
// 1) Suggest a bound: 'a: 'b
// 2) Suggest replacing 'a with 'static. If any of `outlived` is `'static`, then we
// should just replace 'a with 'static.
// 3) Suggest unifying 'a with 'b if we have both 'a: 'b and 'b: 'a
if outlived
.iter()
.any(|(_, outlived_name)| matches!(outlived_name.source, RegionNameSource::Static))
{
suggested.push(SuggestedConstraint::Static(fr_name));
} else {
// We want to isolate out all lifetimes that should be unified and print out
// separate messages for them.
let (unified, other): (Vec<_>, Vec<_>) = outlived.into_iter().partition(
// Do we have both 'fr: 'r and 'r: 'fr?
|(r, _)| {
self.constraints_to_add
.get(r)
.is_some_and(|r_outlived| r_outlived.as_slice().contains(fr))
},
);
for (r, bound) in unified.into_iter() {
if !unified_already.contains(fr) {
suggested.push(SuggestedConstraint::Equal(fr_name.clone(), bound));
unified_already.insert(r);
}
}
if !other.is_empty() {
let other =
other.iter().map(|(_, rname)| rname.clone()).collect::<SmallVec<_>>();
suggested.push(SuggestedConstraint::Outlives(fr_name, other))
}
}
}
suggested
}
/// Add the outlives constraint `fr: outlived_fr` to the set of constraints we need to suggest.
pub(crate) fn collect_constraint(&mut self, fr: RegionVid, outlived_fr: RegionVid) {
debug!("Collected {:?}: {:?}", fr, outlived_fr);
// Add to set of constraints for final help note.
self.constraints_to_add.entry(fr).or_default().push(outlived_fr);
}
/// Emit an intermediate note on the given `Diagnostic` if the involved regions are
/// suggestable.
pub(crate) fn intermediate_suggestion(
&mut self,
mbcx: &MirBorrowckCtxt<'_, '_>,
errci: &ErrorConstraintInfo<'_>,
diag: &mut Diagnostic,
) {
// Emit an intermediate note.
let fr_name = self.region_vid_to_name(mbcx, errci.fr);
let outlived_fr_name = self.region_vid_to_name(mbcx, errci.outlived_fr);
if let (Some(fr_name), Some(outlived_fr_name)) = (fr_name, outlived_fr_name)
&& !matches!(outlived_fr_name.source, RegionNameSource::Static)
{
diag.help(format!(
"consider adding the following bound: `{fr_name}: {outlived_fr_name}`",
));
}
}
/// If there is a suggestion to emit, add a diagnostic to the buffer. This is the final
/// suggestion including all collected constraints.
pub(crate) fn add_suggestion(&self, mbcx: &mut MirBorrowckCtxt<'_, '_>) {
// No constraints to add? Done.
if self.constraints_to_add.is_empty() {
debug!("No constraints to suggest.");
return;
}
// If there is only one constraint to suggest, then we already suggested it in the
// intermediate suggestion above.
if self.constraints_to_add.len() == 1
&& self.constraints_to_add.values().next().unwrap().len() == 1
{
debug!("Only 1 suggestion. Skipping.");
return;
}
// Get all suggestable constraints.
let suggested = self.compile_all_suggestions(mbcx);
// If there are no suggestable constraints...
if suggested.is_empty() {
debug!("Only 1 suggestable constraint. Skipping.");
return;
}
// If there is exactly one suggestable constraints, then just suggest it. Otherwise, emit a
// list of diagnostics.
let mut diag = if suggested.len() == 1 {
mbcx.infcx.tcx.sess.diagnostic().struct_help(match suggested.last().unwrap() {
SuggestedConstraint::Outlives(a, bs) => {
let bs: SmallVec<[String; 2]> = bs.iter().map(|r| r.to_string()).collect();
format!("add bound `{a}: {}`", bs.join(" + "))
}
SuggestedConstraint::Equal(a, b) => {
format!("`{a}` and `{b}` must be the same: replace one with the other")
}
SuggestedConstraint::Static(a) => format!("replace `{a}` with `'static`"),
})
} else {
// Create a new diagnostic.
let mut diag = mbcx
.infcx
.tcx
.sess
.diagnostic()
.struct_help("the following changes may resolve your lifetime errors");
// Add suggestions.
for constraint in suggested {
match constraint {
SuggestedConstraint::Outlives(a, bs) => {
let bs: SmallVec<[String; 2]> = bs.iter().map(|r| r.to_string()).collect();
diag.help(format!("add bound `{a}: {}`", bs.join(" + ")));
}
SuggestedConstraint::Equal(a, b) => {
diag.help(format!(
"`{a}` and `{b}` must be the same: replace one with the other",
));
}
SuggestedConstraint::Static(a) => {
diag.help(format!("replace `{a}` with `'static`"));
}
}
}
diag
};
// We want this message to appear after other messages on the mir def.
let mir_span = mbcx.body.span;
diag.sort_span = mir_span.shrink_to_hi();
// Buffer the diagnostic
mbcx.buffer_non_error_diag(diag);
}
}